Český finanční a účetní časopis 2021(1):37-51 | DOI: 10.18267/j.cfuc.554

Tax, financial and macroeconomic factors of corporate giving in the context of the Czech economy

Marek Halada
Ostravská univerzita, Přírodovědecká fakulta, 30. dubna 22, 701 03 Ostrava

The willingness of companies to donate is influenced by a number of factors. This paper intended to determine to what extent the tax legislation, financial results and macroeconomic factors affect corporate donation. Correlation analyses were used to determine the strength and significance of the relationships between variables. Model was based on data from the Ministry of Finance Czech Republic for the period 2002–2019. I have found that changes in tax regulation does not have a significant impact on donations, because companies manage donor policy primarily on the basis of the result achieved. Although the relationship of donation with costs has not proven to be significant, it cannot be excluded that companies view donation primarily as a cost item similar to advertising or PR.

Keywords: Altruism; Corporate philantropy; Corporate social responsibility; CSR, Deductibility limits; Donating; Giving; Tax policy; Tax shelters
JEL classification: D21, D64, L3, M14

Received: April 9, 2021; Revised: July 16, 2021; Accepted: July 19, 2021; Prepublished online: September 2, 2021; Published: September 3, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Halada, M. (2021). Tax, financial and macroeconomic factors of corporate giving in the context of the Czech economy. Czech Financial and Accounting Journal2021(1), 37-51. doi: 10.18267/j.cfuc.554
Download citation

References

  1. ADAMS, M., HARDWICK, P., 1998. An Analysis of Corporate Donations: United Kingdom Evidence. Journal of Management Studies [online]. Sv. 35, č. 5, s. 641-654 [vid. 2020-07-23]. doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00113. Go to original source...
  2. ALMUNIA, M., GUCERI, I., LOCKWOOD, B., SCHARF, K., 2020. More giving or more givers? The effects of tax incentives on charitable donations in the UK. Journal of Public Economics [online]. Sv. 183, s. 104-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.104114. Go to original source...
  3. AMATO, L. H., AMATO, C. H., 2012. Retail Philanthropy: Firm Size, Industry, and Business Cycle. Journal of Business Ethics. Sv. 107, č. 4, s. 435-448. Dostupné z: doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-1048-x. Go to original source...
  4. ANDREONI, J., 2001. Philanthropy, Economics of. In: International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences [online]. B.m.: Elsevier. S. 11369-11376. doi: 10.1016/b0-08-043076-7/02298-1. Go to original source...
  5. ANDREONI, J., 2015. Charity and Philanthropy, Economics of. In: International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences [online]. B.m.: Elsevier. S. 358-363. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.71001-4. Go to original source...
  6. BAKIJA, J., HEIM, B. T., 2008. How Does Charitable Giving Respond to Incentives and Income? Dynamic Panel Estimates Accounting for Predictable Changes in Taxation. SSRN Electronic Journal [online]. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1120996. Go to original source...
  7. BATSON, C. D., SHAW, L. L., 1991. Evidence for Altruism: Toward a Pluralism of Prosocial Motives. Psychological Inquiry [online]. Roč. 2, č. 2, s. 107-122. doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli0202_1. Go to original source...
  8. BRAMMER, S., MILLINGTON, A., 2005. Profit maximisation vs. agency: An analysis of charitable giving by UK firms. Cambridge Journal of Economics [online]. Sv. 29, č. 4, s. 517-534. doi: 10.1093/cje/bei036. Go to original source...
  9. BRAMMER, S., MILLINGTON, A., 2008. Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal [online]. Sv. 29, č. 12, s. 1325-1343. doi: 10.1002/smj.714. Go to original source...
  10. CHALUPNÍČEK, P., 2008. Altruism and social entrepreneurship - towards a theory of non-market organizations. Politická ekonomie [online]. Sv. 56, č. 5, s. 643-655. [vid. 5. 3. 2021]. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.656. Go to original source...
  11. ČSÚ, 2019. Hlavní makroekonomické ukazatele [online]. [vid. 26. 8. 2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/hmu_cr.
  12. DUQUETTE, N. J., 2016. Do tax incentives affect charitable contributions? Evidence from public charities' reported revenues. Journal of Public Economics [online]. Sv. 137, s. 51-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.02.002. Go to original source...
  13. FINANČNÍ SPRÁVA, 2020a. Databáze daňových tiskopisů | Daňové tiskopisy | Finanční správa [online]. [vid. 25. 3. 2021]. Dostupné z: https://www.financnisprava.cz/cs/danove-tiskopisy/databaze-aktualnich-danovych-tiskopisu.aspx/?rok=2020&tiskdruh=TDFU&dan=T_WEB03.
  14. FINANČNÍ SPRÁVA, 2020b. Údaje z daňových přiznání | Analýzy a statistiky | Daně | Finanční správa [online]. [vid. 25. 3. 2021]. Dostupné z: https://www.financnisprava.cz/cs/dane/analyzy-a-statistiky/udaje-z-danovych-priznani.
  15. GITTELL, R., TEBALDI, E., 2006. Charitable Giving: Factors Influencing Giving in U.S. States. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly [online]. Sv. 35, č. 4, s. 721-736. doi: 10.1177/0899764006289768. Go to original source...
  16. HANOUSEK, J., KOČENDA, E., SVÍTKOVÁ, K., 2010. Corporate philanthropy in the Czech and Slovak republics. Finance a Uver - Czech Journal of Economics and Finance. Sv. 60, č. 2, s. 102-121. ISSN 00151920. Dostupné také z: doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1125712. Go to original source...
  17. HENDERSON, D., 2005. Misguided Virtue. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.681168. Go to original source...
  18. HLADKÁ, M., HYÁNEK, V., 2017. A Model of Donor Behaviour in the Czech Republic. Acta Oeconomica Pragensia [online]. Sv. 25, č. 2, 17-33. doi: 10.18267/j.aop.572. Go to original source...
  19. HLAVÁČEK, M., HLAVÁČEK, J., 2007. Za jakých podmínek je pro firmu lukrativním společensky zodpovědné chování ? [online]. IES Occasional Paper 3/2007 [vid. 14. 3. 2020]. Dostupné z: http://ies.fsv.cuni.cz/default/file/download/ id/5687.
  20. JOHNSON, O., 1966. Corporate Philanthropy: An Analysis of Corporate Contributions. The Journal of Business. Sv. 39, č. 4, s. 489-504. doi: 10.1086/294890. Go to original source...
  21. KARNANI, A. G., 2010. The Case Against Corporate Social Responsibility. The Wall Street Journal [online]. [vid. 1. 2. 2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703338004575230112664504890.
  22. KARNANI, A. G., 2011. CSR Stuck in a Logical Trap a Response to Pietra Rivoli and Sandra Waddock's "'First They Ignore You…': The Time-Context Dynamic and Corporate Responsibility". California Management Review. Sv. 53, č. 2, s. 105-111. doi: 10.1525/cmr.2011.53.2.105. Go to original source...
  23. KIRSCHNEROVÁ, P., JANOUŠKOVÁ, J., 2017. The tax deduction to donations of companies in the Czech regions. In: Sborník příspěvků z mezinárodní vědecké konference Region v rozvoji společnosti 2016 [online]. Brno: Mendelova univerzita, s. 423-430 [vid. 10. 5. 2020]. Dostupné z: http://www.icabr.com/respo/ RESPO_2016.pdf.
  24. KITCHEN, H., 1992. Determinants of charitable donations in Canada: a comparison over time. Applied Economics [online]. Sv. 24, č. 7, s. 709-713. [vid. 14. 8. 2020]. doi: 10.1080/00036849200000039. Go to original source...
  25. KOMERČNÍ BANKA, 2020. Společenská odpovědnost | Komerční banka [online]. [vid. 13. 1. 2021]. Dostupné z: https://www.kb.cz/cs/o-bance/vse-o-kb/spolecenska-odpovednost.
  26. NAVARRO, P., 1988. Why Do People Really Give to Charity ? The Journal of Business [online]. Sv. 61, č. 1, s. 65-93. Dostupné z: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2352980. doi: 10.1086/296420. Go to original source...
  27. NET4GAS, 2020. Firemní filantropie - NET4GAS [online]. [vid. 31. 1. 2020]. Dostupné z: https://www.net4gas.cz/cz/csr/.
  28. PORTER, M. E., KRAMER, M. R., 2002. The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review [online]. Sv. 133, s. 56-68. Dostupné z: https://hbr.org/archive-toc/BR0212.
  29. QIAN, C., GAO, X., TSANG, A., 2015. Corporate Philanthropy, Ownership Type, and Financial Transparency. Journal of Business Ethics [online]. doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2109-8. Go to original source...
  30. REICH, R. B., 2008. The Case Against Corporate Social Responsibility. SSRN Electronic Journal [online]. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1213129. Go to original source...
  31. ŠKODA AUTO, 2020. ŠKODA Sustainability [online]. [vid. 13. 1. 2021]. Dostupné z: https://www.skoda-auto.com/company/sustainability-social-responsibility.
  32. TIEHEN, L., 2001. Tax Policy and Charitable Contributions of Money. National Tax Journal [online]. Sv. 54 č. 4, s. 707-723. [vid. 1. 2. 2021]. doi: 10.17310/ntj.2001.4.01. Go to original source...
  33. WEBB, N. J., 1996. Tax Incentives for Corporate Giving Programs: Administration in Social Work [online]. Sv. 20, č. 3, s. 39-56. doi: 10.1300/J147v20n03_03. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.