Český finanční a účetní časopis 2011(1):55-67 | DOI: 10.18267/j.cfuc.97

Tax Measures Taken to Fight the Crisis in Developed Countries

Jiří Kostohryz
Ing. Jiří Kostohryz - doktorand; Katedra veřejných financí, Fakulta financí a účetnictví, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, nám. W. Churchilla 4, 130 67 Praha 3; <xkosj27@vse.cz>.

The article describes the importance and reasons of tax measures taken to fight the crisis. At the beginning it is the comparison of tax policy measures in the context of other measures. Attention is paid to the comparison of fiscal measures in the OECD. Next are presented the basic types of tax measures taken to fight the crisis (Corporate income tax rate reductions, Accelerated depreciation, Loss carryforward and carryback provisions, R&D credit enhancements, Indirect tax activity, Personal income tax measures). The article also presents two currently discussed tax theory concepts related to the prevention of potential crises in the future, namely, financial transaction tax and the concepts of tax neutrality due to the method of financing.

Keywords: Financial Crisis; Tax policy; Taxation; Financial transaction tax; Fiscal Stimulus.
JEL classification: H12, H2, H63

Published: March 1, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kostohryz, J. (2011). Tax Measures Taken to Fight the Crisis in Developed Countries. Czech Financial and Accounting Journal2011(1), 55-67. doi: 10.18267/j.cfuc.97
Download citation

References

  1. Angelov, D. - Djankov, S. (2009): Tax Stimulus as Crisis Response. [on-line]. Sofia, Bulgarian Macroeconomic Association, c2009, [cit.: 26. 2. 2010], <http://bmabg.s801.sureserver.com/assets/var/docs/Tax-Stimulus-as-Crisis-Response-18012009.pdf>.
  2. Campbell, J. Y. - Froot, K. A. (1994): International Experience with Securities Transaction Taxes. In Frankel, A. F. (eds.): The Internationalization of Equity Markets. NBER, University of Chicago Press, 1994, s. 277-308. Go to original source...
  3. CEPR (2011): Support for a Financial Transactions Tax. [on-line], Washington, D. C., Center for Economic and Policy Research, c2011, [cit.: 26. 2. 2011], <http://www.cepr.net/documents/ftt-support.pdf>.
  4. Devereux, M. P. - De Mooij, R. A. (2009): Alternative Systems of Business Tax in Europe: An applied analysis of ACE and CBIT Reforms. [on-line], Taxation Papers, č. 17, c2009, [cit.: 26. 2. 2010], <http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/resources/documents/taxation/gen_info/economic_analysis/tax_papers/taxation_paper_17_en.pdf>.
  5. Djankov, S. - Ganser, T. - McLiesh, C. - Ramalho, R. - Shleifer, A. (2009): The Effect of Corporate Taxes on Investment and Entrepreneurship. Cambridge, NBER, Working Paper č. 13756, 2009. Go to original source...
  6. Ernst&Young (2009): Worldwide Fiscal Stimulus. Tax Policy Plays a Major Role. [online]. London, Ernst&Young, c2009, [cit.: 20.4.2011], <http://www2.eycom.ch/publications/items/tax/2009_ww_fiscal_stimulus>.
  7. European Commission (2009): European Economic Forecast, Autumn 2009. [on-line]. Brussels, European Commission, c2009, [cit.: 15. 11. 2010], <http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/taxation/gen_info/economic_analysis/tax_structures/index_en.htm>.
  8. Fantini, M. (2011): Taxation Trends in the European Union, Edition 2011. Presentation. [on-line]. Brussels, European Commission, c2011, [cit.: 1. 10. 2011], <http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/taxation/gen_info/economic_analysis/tax_structures/index_en.htm>.
  9. Guellec, D. - Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2009): Policy Responses to the Economic Crisis: Investing in Innovation for Long-Term Growth. [on-line]. Paris, OECD, c2009, [cit.: 17. 11. 2010], <http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/59/45/42983414.pdf>.
  10. Hemmelgarn, T. - Nicodème, G. (2010): The 2008 Financial Crisis and Tax Policy. [online], Taxation Papers č. 20, c2010, [cit.: 30. 9. 2011], <http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/resources/documents/taxation/gen_info/economic_analysis/tax_papers/taxation_paper_20_en.pdf>.
  11. Národní ekonomická rada vlády (2009): Závěrečná zpráva 2009. [on-line], Praha, NERV, c2009, [cit.: 10. 11. 2010], <http://www.vlada.cz/cz/media-centrum/dulezite-dokumenty/>.
  12. OECD (2009): OECD Economic Outlook Interim Report, March 2009. [on-line]. Paris, OECD, c2009, [cit.: 17. 11. 2010], <http://browse.oecdbookshop.org/oecd/pdfs/free/1208051e.pdf>.
  13. Ramey, V. (2008): Identifying Government Spending Shocks: It's All in the Timing. San Diego, University of California at San Diego, 2008. Go to original source...
  14. Romer, C. - Romer D. (2008): The Macroeconomic Effects of Tax Changes: Estimates Based on a New Measure of Fiscal Shocks. Berkeley, University of California at Berkeley, 2008. Go to original source...
  15. Shapiro, M. D. - Slemrod, J. B. (2009): Did the 2008 Tax Rebates Stimulate Spending. [on-line]. Cambridge, NBER, Working Paper č. 14753, c2009, [cit.: 1. 5. 2011], <http://www.nber.org/papers/w14753>. Go to original source...
  16. Schulmeister, S. - Schratzenstaller, M. - Picek, O. (2008): A General Fiancial Transaction Tax. Motives, Revenues, Feasibility and Effects. Wien, Austrian Institute of Economic Research, c2008, [cit.: 1. 5. 2011], <http://www.wifo.ac.at/wwa/downloadController/displayDbDoc.htm?item=S_2008_FINANCIAL_TRANSACTION_TAX_31819$.PDF>. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.