Český finanční a účetní časopis 2012(3):61-70 | DOI: 10.18267/j.cfuc.322
Necessity of Changes in the Point of View on the Randomness in the Frame of Economic Paradigm
- 1 Prof. Ing. Jaroslav Daňhel, CSc. - profesor; Katedra bankovnictví a pojišťovnictví, Fakulta financí a účetnictví, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, nám. W. Churchilla 4, 130 67 Praha 3, <danhel@vse.cz>.
- 2 Prof. Ing. Eva Ducháčková, CSc. - profesorka; Katedra bankovnictví a pojišťovnictví, Fakulta financí a účetnictví, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, nám. W. Churchilla 4, 130 67 Praha 3, <duchack@vse.cz>.
Problem of current world economy results from reality that we do not know to manage comprehensive complicated economic word with elements unrestrained randomness. Way to implement mathematics to economic science in not efficient, the same statement is valid about "risk based approach". Effort to normative prediction put on the periphery of interest ethics problems. Crisis provoked political pressure on extensity of regulation. Dilemma is: to support of naturally correct economic surroundings or strong regulation to restrict unethical behavior.Overcoming our cognitive insufficiency and finding new paradigm with anticipation of unrestrained randomness is very acute.
Keywords: Economic paradigm; Randomness; Financial and economic crises; Formalization or economic science; Welfare state model; Ethics of economic interaction; Regulatory projects.
JEL classification: A11, B41, G01, G20
Published: October 1, 2012 Show citation
References
- Alexander, P. (2011): New Regulations See Insurers and Banks Link up over Liquidity. [on-line], The Banker z 30. 6. 2011, c2011, [cit.: 20. 9. 2012], <http://www.thebanker.com/Reports/Special-Reports/Navigating-a-new-landscape-Derivatives-structuring/New-regulations-see-insurers-and-banks-link-up-over-liquidity?ct=true>.
- FCIC (2011): Final Report of the National Commission on the Causes of the Financial and Economic Crisis in the United States. [on-line], Washington, Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, c2011, [cit.: 10. 7. 2012], <http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-FCIC/pdf/GPO-FCIC.pdf >. - není citováno
- Kahneman, D. - Tversky A. - Slovic, P. (eds.) (1982): Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics & Biases, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1982.
Go to original source... - Kahneman, D. - Tversky, A. (1979): Prospekt Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica, 1979, roč. 47, č. 2, s. 263-291.
Go to original source... - Keynes, J. M. (1923): A Tract on Monetary Reform. London, Macmillan, 1923.
- Krugman, P. (2009): How Did Economists Get It So Wrong? [on-line], The New York Times z 2. 9. 2009. c2011, [cit.: 20. 9. 2012], <http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/06/magazine/06Economic-t.html?pagewanted=all>.
- Mandel, M. - Tomšík, V. (2011): Regulace bankovního sektoru z pohledu ekonomické teorie. Politická ekonomie, 2011, roč. 59, č. 1, s. 58-81.
Go to original source... - Mlčoch, L. (2006): Ekonomie důvěry a společného dobra. Praha, Karolinum, 2006.
- Sedláček, T. (2009): Ekonomie dobra a zla. Praha, Nakladatelství 65. pole, 2009.
- Schumpeter, J. (1987): Teorie ekonomického vývoje. Bratislava, Pravda, 1987.
- Šabatka, J. (2011): Bankovní regulace: Tržní regulace jako řešení (diplomová práce). Praha, Vysoká škola ekonomická, 2011.
- Taleb, N. N. (2012): Černá labuť. Litomyšl, Paseka, 2012.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
